vgvassilev wrote: > The comment is still wrong, but we're not getting anywhere. This needs to end > now, the bot has been broken way too long!
As I’ve been saying we need to improve the clang part to detect the paths reliably. That’s beyond the intended scope of the set of patches I submitted. I agree with you that this is getting nowhere as it seems that you have a particular idea how things should be. Probably it would have been more efficient to make a patch and help your fellow llvm developers rather than criticizing and saying things are wrong. That’s not in the spirit of the llvm development experience we usually see. Nevertheless, I’d like to thank you in offering a hand at testing the patches out. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/176198 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
