zaks.anna added a comment. > What do you suggest? Should we widen the type of the difference, or abandon > this patch and revert back to the local solution I originally used in the > iterator checker?
Does the local solution you used in the iterator checker not have the same problem? https://reviews.llvm.org/D35109 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
