frno7 wrote: > The `-mfix-r5900` option does seem usefull then, so I added it back in.
Great, many thanks, @rickgaiser! > For inline assembly there is currently no fix or warning. I could add a new > warning flag `-Wmips-r5900-short-loop`, only active when targeting R5900 or > when `-mfix-r5900` is used? That would be very nice indeed, and helpful to avoid difficult-to-find erratum disasters. I recall that @maciej-w-rozycki objected to it for GAS some years ago, on the grounds that they who wield the `noreorder` directive “know what they are doing”. But as mentioned, the poor R5900 is typically ignored by the authors in such cases. Maciej, what’s your assessment today? :-) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/176666 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
