fogsong233 wrote: > I am a bit confused, if the lambda is on the global scope it implicitly > captures by reference, right: https://godbolt.org/z/rM1z1xfjq我有点困惑，如果 lambda > 在全局作用域中，它会隐式地按引用捕获，对吧：https://godbolt.org/z/rM1z1xfjq > > In that sense I'd think the diagnostic is correct, right?从这个角度来看，我认为诊断是正确的，对吧？
It really depends on how clang-repl defines its execution context. Intuitively, we feel like we are working within a function scope (like main), so we unconsciously reach for [&] or [&variable] to capture surrounding state. However, technically, clang-repl treats these variables as globals to ensure persistence, meaning we can access them directly without any capture. The diagnostic, therefore, reflects this implementation choice: we perceive it as a local context, but the tool defines it as global. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178579 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
