RKSimon wrote:

> BITREVERSE includes all integer types whereas BITREVB is byte granular. So, 
> thought of having it separately.

I don't think thats necessary - SSE/AVX already have plenty of intrinsics that 
wrap generics but are only available for some integer types (multiply and 
add/sub saturation are examples that come to mind but there's plenty of others) 
- the more we avoid target specifics the better imo.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179150
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to