woruyu wrote: > Sorry, have been swamped with Actual Job(tm) stuff, I'd like to reiterate > @shafik's comments - can we have a follow up PR for the negative cases > (unsupported bitwidths and the like)
It's easy to refactor to a meaning function name. But I don't know whether we need to deal with bit widths between 2 and 7. Friendly ping @RKSimon , @tbaederr https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179177 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
