balazske wrote:

> I was initially a little confused by check name, maybe 
> `bugprone-exception-unsafe-functions` is better, WDYT?

I think that name can be confusing because the check does not find any of the 
unsafe functions, only if the exceptions are explicitly allowed in an unsafe 
function.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/176430
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to