================
@@ -505,6 +800,12 @@ TEST_F(JSONFormatTUSummaryTest,
NamespaceElementInvalidKind) {
}
}
],
+ "linkage_table": [
+ {
+ "id": 0,
+ "linkage": { "type": "external" }
+ }
+ ],
----------------
steakhal wrote:
I think now I understand what I dislike with this representation.
There is a lot of syntactic noise with this, while structuring it like this
would make it more compact:
```
"linkage_table": {
"none": [1,2,31],
"internal": [],
"external": [0]
},
```
We agree to not optimize the JSON layout but if we don't assume more linkage
types, I think it's a sensible step to do.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/182961
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
