alexshap added a comment.

@arphaman

  The selection requirement is supposed to be orthogonal to AST matchers, not a 
replacement. It should be used when working with source selection in editors. 
  I did mess around with moving over clang-reorder-fields using this kind of 
model and didn't see any issues when using AST matchers. Essentially I used the 
 requiredOption requirements and mapped them to run my 
  matching code instead of using the selection requirement. Thus this 
requirement was satisfied only when the AST matchers were successful. 
  It might be possible to simplify that pattern even further to make it simpler.

that's great, i'm interested in this too and would be happy to see 
clang-reorder-fields moving to clang-refactor (pls, let me know if i can help 
make this happen)


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D36075



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to