================
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ class ToolChain {
mutable std::optional<CXXStdlibType> cxxStdlibType;
mutable std::optional<RuntimeLibType> runtimeLibType;
mutable std::optional<UnwindLibType> unwindLibType;
+ mutable std::optional<std::string> cstdlibType;
----------------
voltur01 wrote:
Hi, the trade-off was discussed in the Embedded Working Group last week
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/llvm-embedded-toolchains-working-group-sync-up/63270/90
- there was no clear conclusion though.
>From Arm Toolchain point of view a string would be simpler, however we only
>use the three libraries (LLVM libc, picolibc and newlib) that are already
>supported by LLVM, e.g. in libc++, so hopefully will be included into the enum
>from the beginning.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/183254
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits