mkindahl wrote: > Could we use something more generic, like > `bugprone-unsafe-api-functions-calls`?
Renamed it as suggested. Not sure if "api" in the name is implicitly understood as "C API", but looking at other names, I find nothing similar that would suggest it should be, for example "c11-api", or "std-api". However, there is a bunch of similar POSIX calls that also have subtle problems. There are a few checks that cover POSIX behavior, but no similar "catch-all" checker name for POSIX function calls. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/187637 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
