================
@@ -1297,6 +1297,11 @@ class AnnotatingParser {
next();
return true;
}
+ // Avoid consuming an unbalanced `}` here: it would pop a Scopes frame
+ // owned by an enclosing parseBrace and trip its `!Scopes.empty()`
+ // assertion. See Issue #199017.
----------------
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
This would be the first reference to an github issue in the source code, so I'd
say we should do not do this.
In the tests we have a few links, but as actual links, not just numbers.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/199098
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
