erichkeane wrote: > > I'm unfamiliar with `ucf`? Is that a dialect that google doesn't know > > about? If so, why doesn't said dialect have the lifetime markers rather > > than CIR? > > Unstructured control flow (blocks + branches).
Ah, thanks :) Then yes, we'd definitely need that. Do we/do we intend to do that at the CIR level, or as a part of lowering to other dialects? I'm not against these if we intend to do that conversion entirely within CIR, but as @Lancern mentioned above: I want to make sure we're not going to have Clang generate these https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/199599 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
