NoQ marked 3 inline comments as done. NoQ added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35216#886212, @rsmith wrote:
> This is precisely how the rest of the compiler handles > `CXXStdInitializerListExpr` Wow. Cool. I'd see what I can do. Yeah, it seems that this is a great case for us to pattern-match the implementations as well (the problems are still there for other STL stuff). Do you think this patch should be blocked in favor of complete modeling? Or i can land that and follow up with complete modeling later; it'd be a larger, but not much to discuss indeed. Or i can try always "inlining" initializer_list constructor and methods during analysis, if all methods are available in the header in all implementations. https://reviews.llvm.org/D35216 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
