================
@@ -4670,6 +4670,82 @@ def CIR_StackRestoreOp : CIR_Op<"stackrestore"> {
   let assemblyFormat = "$ptr attr-dict `:` qualified(type($ptr))";
 }
 
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// LifetimeStartOp & LifetimeEndOp
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+def CIR_LifetimeStartOp : CIR_Op<"lifetime.start"> {
+  let summary = "Marks the start of the lifetime of a variable produced by a 
cir.alloca operation";
+  let description = [{
+    The `cir.lifetime.start` operation marks the beginning of the lifetime
+    of the storage pointed to by `$ptr`. Between this operation and a
+    matching `cir.lifetime.end` on the same pointer, the underlying storage
+    is considered live; outside that range it is considered dead, and the
+    optimizer is free to reuse the storage for other purposes.
+
+    The `cir.scope` is the operation that models the block scope of the C/C++
+    source. Once ClangIR is no longer structured, `cir.scope` can no longer 
express 
+    the lifetime of a local variable. This happens, for example, after 
`FlattenCFG`,
+    where `cir.scope` regions are dissolved into plain basic blocks, or after
+    `HoistAllocas`, where an alloca is moved to the function entry so that its
+    position no longer reflects the scope it was declared in. In that form, 
these
+    lifetime markers are what delimit the beginning and end of a variable's
+    lifetime.
+
+    The verifier requires `$ptr` to be produced by a `cir.alloca`. For the
+    lifetime to be meaningful, a matching `cir.lifetime.end` on the same
+    pointer should follow on every control-flow path. Note that, unlike LLVM
----------------
Lancern wrote:

```suggestion
    pointer should follow on every control-flow path. This is different from 
LLVM
```

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/199599
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to