yaxunl added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35082#890143, @rjmccall wrote:
> You have an important backend change relying on being able to preserve type > sugar better in diagnostics? The only apparent semantic change in this patch > is that you're changing the mangling, which frankly seems incorrect. Can you elaborate on why the mangling is incorrect? https://reviews.llvm.org/D35082 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
