================
@@ -1015,3 +1015,22 @@ struct OtherMoveSafeClasses {
// aggressive-note@-2 {{Moved-from object 'Task' is moved}}
}
};
+
+void safeOperatorAfterMove() {
+ std::list<std::string> l1;
+ l1.push_back("l1");
+ std::list<std::string> l2;
----------------
steakhal wrote:
It is a bit a double-edged sword because all of these tests share the same
reporting line. Consequently, it makes it more difficult to see which case
breaks the expectation.
It's also technically incorrect because we pass an empty container - yet, we
expect that it at least had one element initially. So I think an explicit
template instantiation would be more correct - instead of spelling out calls
and relying on implicit instantiations.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/196602
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
