danielmarjamaki added a reviewer: danielmarjamaki. danielmarjamaki added a comment.
> However, the checker seems to work with a low false positive rate. (<15 on > the LLVM, 6 effectively different) This does not sound like a low false positive rate to me. Could you describe what the false positives are? Is it possible to fix them? > Is it enough or should I check it on other open source projects? you should check a number of different projects. There might be idioms/usages in other projects that are not seen in LLVM. However I don't know what other open source C++11 projects there are. But I have a script that runs clang on various Debian projects and I can run that and provide you with the results. https://reviews.llvm.org/D38675 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits