================
@@ -3193,20 +3193,20 @@ void ExprEngine::VisitCommonDeclRefExpr(const Expr *Ex, 
const NamedDecl *D,
 void ExprEngine::VisitArrayInitLoopExpr(const ArrayInitLoopExpr *Ex,
                                         ExplodedNode *Pred,
                                         ExplodedNodeSet &Dst) {
+  const Expr *Arr = Ex->getCommonExpr()->getSourceExpr();
+
   ExplodedNodeSet CheckerPreStmt;
   getCheckerManager().runCheckersForPreStmt(CheckerPreStmt, Pred, Ex, *this);
 
   ExplodedNodeSet EvalSet;
-  NodeBuilder Bldr(CheckerPreStmt, EvalSet, *currBldrCtx);
-
-  const Expr *Arr = Ex->getCommonExpr()->getSourceExpr();
+  if (isa<CXXConstructExpr>(Ex->getSubExpr())) {
+    // The constructor visitior has already taken care of everything, so let's
+    // skip forward to the PostStmt handling after the 'for' loop.
+    EvalSet.insert(CheckerPreStmt);
+    CheckerPreStmt.clear();
+  }
----------------
steakhal wrote:

This comment was pretty confusing because I was expecting the subsequent loop 
to be conditional, while in fact this it is unconditional but the range is 
cleared. I think that `clear` call needs to stand out more.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/204354
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to