HighCommander4 wrote:

> There is #42259

(That's an unrelated deficiency in the modeling of `auto` types which does not 
come into play here. In this case, both `getType()` and the TSI correctly 
contain deduced types, they just differ in the amount of type sugar they have.)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/207323
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to