================
@@ -115,13 +115,16 @@ class StmtVisitorBase {
// If the implementation chooses not to implement a certain visit method,
fall
// back on VisitExpr or whatever else is the superclass.
+ // clang-format off
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
In at least a few of those it is much better, and I'd rather have those
(particularly `STMT` nad `BINOP_FALLBACK`. But what it did to the lists is
obviously horrifying. Could you tighten the clang-format off to be more
targetted to only the ones that are particularly awful? The project has a
general 'disagree-and-commit' to whatever clang-format gives us unless
particularly horrifying.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/203125
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
