================
@@ -6499,6 +6499,8 @@ static ExprResult BuildConvertedConstantExpression(Sema
&S, Expr *From,
return ExprError();
if (From->containsErrors()) {
+ if (isa<RecoveryExpr>(From))
----------------
Serosh-commits wrote:
> What if the existing RecoveryExpr has a type which is not T? Wasn't that the
> point of the PR which introduced this check?
>
> What about not introducing the RecoveryExpr in case the expression already
> has type T?
addressed it sorry about the delay due to college work are going on i am unable
to work on my prs
really sorry abt that
thanks for pointing it out :)
> What if the existing RecoveryExpr has a type which is not T? Wasn't that the
> point of the PR which introduced this check?
>
> What about not introducing the RecoveryExpr in case the expression already
> has type T?
sorry for the delay due to college works i am unable to get time to work on my
prs :\ btw addressed it
thanks for pointing out
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/207072
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
