tmsriram added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39079#905423, @rnk wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39079#905395, @joerg wrote: > > > Let me phrase it differently. What is this patch (and the matching backend > > PR) supposed to achieve? There are effectively two ways to get rid of PLT > > entries: > > (1) Bind references locally. This is effectively what -Bsymbolic does and > > what is breaking the ELF interposition rules. > > (2) Do an indirect call via the GOT. Requires knowing what an external > > symbol is, making it non-attractive for anything but LTO, since it will > > create performance issues for all non-local accesses (i.e. anything > > private). > > > This patch does 2. According to @tmsriram, clever linkers can turn the > indirect call back into a nop+call_pcrel32. If this isn't universal, the user > must know what their linker supports. I don't see how it causes performance > issues for non-local calls, since the PLT will do a jump through the GOT > anyway. Yes, please see this for GOLD linkers: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2016-05/msg00322.html https://reviews.llvm.org/D39079 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
