ArcsinX wrote: > Now it only rejects `CXXConversionFunctionName`.
That was exactly my question. If we always reject `CXXConversionFunctionName`, might we be discarding cases that shouldn't be discarded? I gave an example earlier involving `CXXConversionFunctionName` (`W.operator Something`) where including a header would have fixed the error, but it seems with this patch we would discard such a case? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/212134 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
