efriedma added a comment. > The internal canonical types are compared, so all this typedef sugar will be > silently ignored.
Yes, and that's precisely the problem. On many 32-bit platforms, both "size_t" and "uint32_t" are typedefs for "unsigned int"; on some 32-bit platforms, "size_t" is an "unsigned long". So whether this patch suppresses the warning for a comparison between size_t and uint32_t depends on the target ABI. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D39462 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
