hahnjo wrote: > I don't know why the previous code wrotten like that.
I think the code is simply quite old, from commit e060e57bf74681939ffab90ff743ab8594a8b866 in 2013 when LLVM probably didn't have C++11 range-based `for` loops yet... https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/214438 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
