YuriPlyakhin wrote: > overall the change is fine with me but i agree it would be better if we could > just do LTO, i worked on SYCL LTO support a bit in the downstream compiler > but put it on hold as it would be specific to the old offload model, since we > have much less baggage upstream it would be nice to see if we could enable > LTO sooner rather than later
yep, LTO is the next on my list, after no-rdc. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/215437 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
