efriedma added a comment. > In general, because all of these functions are well defined over the entire > complex domain, they don't have errors. The "no errors defined" is likely > correct.
One, it is not true that all these functions are well-defined over the entire complex domain. For example, according to the C standard `catanh(1)` raises a divide-by-zero error. Two, even for the functions which are defined over the entire complex domain, the result can still overflow and/or underflow, and therefore they could set errno to ERANGE. cabs() can overflow, cexp() can overflow, etc. Three, even if we only care about the behavior of the current version of glibc, cabs() actually does modify errno. (Try `cabs(1.7e308+I*1.7e308)`). https://reviews.llvm.org/D39611 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
