Typz added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33440#920205, @djasper wrote:
> Out of curiosity, will this be able to fix the two situations that you get > for python extension? > There, you usually have a PyObject_HEAD with out semicolon in a struct and > than a PyObject_HEAD_INIT(..) in a braced init list. More info: > http://starship.python.net/crew/mwh/toext/node20.html `PyObject_HEAD` is defined (by defaut) as: Py_ssize_t ob_refcnt; PyTypeObject *ob_type; so declaring it as a statement macro should allow clang-format to process it correctly. (though this is a variable-like macro, so I need to check if this case is supported) `PyObject_HEAD_INIT` ends with a comma, which is not supported yet. We would need to add another kind of macro to support that case. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33440 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
