NoQ added a comment. I'm curious if the crash would turn into an assertion failure during `getRawSVal()` after https://reviews.llvm.org/D38801 is committed.
The problem with this checker producing void symbols is known since https://reviews.llvm.org/D26837. If this problem is fixed on the checker side (it probably should be - the checker , we can probably put stronger asserts onto types suitable for symbols. ================ Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ProgramState.cpp:265 + // to the type of T, which is not always the case (e.g. for void). + if (!T.isNull() && (T->isIntegralOrEnumerationType() || Loc::isLocType(T))) { if (SymbolRef sym = V.getAsSymbol()) { ---------------- If a type is an integral or enumeration type or a Loc type, then it is definitely not null. https://reviews.llvm.org/D39862 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
