avikivity wrote:
> > > @avikivity I'd also consider adding this to the test
> > > ```c++
> > > call([&](auto &t) -> coro_void {
> > > co_await suspend_never{};
> > > co_return use_void(p, t);
> > > });
> > > ```
> >
> >
> > Can you explain why? Does it exercise another path?
>
> Just to keep it consistent with the issue description so that the test cover
> both mentioned case, eventually we do reach the same path with `co_return`
> and `co_await` and the current test is already good to prove the fix works.
Added.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/220234
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
