ssahasra wrote: @vporpo wrote:
> Or even better if we just used one asyncmark per marked instruction. That would defeat one of the key motivations for having asyncmarks. A single call to memcpy can have many instructions in it. But a single asyncmark following the memcpy ensures that all of them are completed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/220442 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
