lazka wrote: > > If we want to do the same for MinGW, I'm happy to make a PR for that. > > I think that might be useful, or what do @lazka and @lhmouse think?
Yes, I think it would be helpful. Reducing the diff to gcc, and providing a better out of the box experience without having to deal with manifests. For context, this is what is currently used: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=cygwin-apps/windows-default-manifest.git;a=blob;f=default-manifest.rc;h=2c4ddf4783b953afaf7df9473450bf95842d1911;hb=HEAD https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/220875 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
