vtjnash wrote: > I don't think this is an NFC change. It changes performance properties of the > implementation, and introduces new concepts.
I had that same argument with Claude. It was convinced I should call this NFC because it argued that those are implementation details, not functional details, which I eventually thought was a good enough point to admit keeping the tag. I'm definitely willing to remove it if that seems clearer. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/220634 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
