aobolensk wrote: > I think we just land through the aarch64 issue. > > I'm inclined to land this ... let's say Thursday, if we don't hear too much > more? > > (But yeah, we should also have a followup about those fences we're adding - > if we're encoding atomicity on the operation, we shouldn't need the fences)
@krzysz00 shall we proceed? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/213585 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
