dan0907 wrote: This fixes the original repro, but the follow-up case here (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/222002#issuecomment-5586406737) — a non-exported class used only inside a function template instantiated from the importing TU — still fails with this patch applied (verified locally). Is that in scope for this PR, or should it be tracked separately?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/222246 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
