================
@@ -1138,24 +1139,44 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitNewArrayInitializer(
CharUnits StartAlign = CurPtr.getAlignment();
unsigned i = 0;
+ auto AdvanceToNextElement = [&]() {
+ CurPtr = Address(Builder.CreateInBoundsGEP(CurPtr.getElementType(),
+ CurPtr.emitRawPointer(*this),
+ Builder.getSize(1),
+ "array.exp.next"),
+ CurPtr.getElementType(),
+ StartAlign.alignmentAtOffset((++i) * ElementSize));
+ };
for (const Expr *IE : InitExprs) {
// Tell the cleanup that it needs to destroy up to this
// element. TODO: some of these stores can be trivially
// observed to be unnecessary.
if (EndOfInit.isValid()) {
Builder.CreateStore(CurPtr.emitRawPointer(*this), EndOfInit);
}
+ // An EmbedExpr can initialize more than one array element.
+ const auto *EmbedS = dyn_cast<EmbedExpr>(IE->IgnoreParenImpCasts());
+ if (EmbedS && EmbedS->getDataElementCount() > 1) {
----------------
Fznamznon wrote:
I'm now confused. f13 covers two elements and I do not see a test with complex
and a single element embed. Aside from that I don't think this is right to ever
create an EmbedExpr for a single element.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/218262
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
