nikic wrote: The blocker for this PR is that it introduces the llvm.ssp.protected intrinsic, which I consider to be categorically the wrong approach, and will not accept even as an intermediate state.
Doing an incremental implementation is fine, but at no point in time should it involve an intrinsic. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/183623 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
