Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <[email protected]>, Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <[email protected]>, Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <[email protected]>, Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <[email protected]>, Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <[email protected]>, Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <[email protected]>, Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <[email protected]>, Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <[email protected]>, Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <[email protected]> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>
smallp-o-p wrote: This has gotten suddenly relevant for libc++ in #203782, where we're using a tagged pointer as the basis for an iterator. I wonder if it might be feasible to bring forward the `clang` side of the changes and leverage the added builtins wherever possible, so that things like `optional::iterator` are allowed to be `constexpr`, at least for `clang`. WDYT @ldionne This would also require some kind of discussion with the Clang folks I assume. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111861 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
