akash-manna-sky wrote: > Is this connected to #232606 ?
Yes, same mechanism. #232606 only guards the call operator's type at the parser call site; this one checks inside `handleLambdaNumbering`, so it also covers the TreeTransform entry, template parameter types and the requires-clause. It fixes the #170185 reproducer too in my opinion, I can add test as well. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/233193 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
