erik.pilkington added a comment. Hi, thanks for working on this! Why don't we just set the TypeDependent bit to false when building the underlying MemberExpr here? Based on the section of the standard you quoted that node shouldn't be considered type-dependent, but it is by clang. I think this patch is just hiding that underlying problem by fishing out the real type-dependence after constructing the MemberExpr when really that information should be included in the MemberExpr to begin with. Thanks, Erik
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40566 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
