Artem-B wrote: > maybe we can just add a marking to the constructor to allow it to be > constant-evaluated?
I think the idea makes a lot of sense. We already require C++11 for CUDA, so if a constructor can be evaluated and proven to be "empty", it should be good enough without special-casing anything. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/222985 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
