alexfh added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41056#950605, @khuttun wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41056#950570, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote: > > > May be //bugprone// is better module then //misc//? > > > Maybe. I can move it if all the reviewers think that it would be better > suited there. Yup, bugprone- should be a better category for this, IMO. I wonder whether libc++ folks are interested in marking unique_ptr::release() with `__attribute__ ((warn_unused_result))`. A compiler warning (with -Werror) would be a better protection against this kind of a bug. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D41056 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
