BillyONeal added inline comments.

================
Comment at: include/numeric:245
     for (; __first1 != __last1; ++__first1, (void) ++__first2)
         __init = __b1(__init, __b2(*__first1, *__first2));
     return __init;
----------------
It's arguable that this should be _VSTD::move(__init); I asked SG1 / LEWG about 
that. (After all, if they're going to make inner_product do that this should 
too)


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D41372



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D41372: [l... Billy Robert O'Neal III via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D4137... Billy Robert O'Neal III via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D4137... Billy Robert O'Neal III via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D4137... Marshall Clow via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D4137... Billy Robert O'Neal III via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D4137... Billy Robert O'Neal III via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to