alexfh added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41716#967247, @vmiklos wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41716#967237, @lebedev.ri wrote: > > > That changes the defaults though. I thought clang-tidy *tried* to produce > > the same results > > on different clang-tidy versions with the same `.clang-tidy` config? Or is > > there no such guarantees? > > > Hmm, I see this as a trade-off between backwards compatibility and > consistency. Here I went for consistency, so that all of > readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name, > modernize-use-default-member-init and modernize-use-using default to > IgnoreMacros=1. But I don't have a too strong opinion on that, can change the > default to 0 if really wanted, I'd personally prefer consistency in this case, especially because the option can be specified globally for all checks. https://reviews.llvm.org/D41716 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
