mstorsjo added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D43184#1005258, @rnk wrote:
> Do you think we should do something like local vftables for itanium instead? > Can we assume all methods in the vtable will be exported by the DLL exporting > the class? Will this actually ever be needed for other vtables than cxxabi::class_type_info and the others from ItaniumRTTIBuilder::BuildVTablePointer? In what other cases are the vtables referred to from a statically initialized global? And for these vtables - there's no declaration of them at all within most translation units, so that'd require hardcoding all the content of these vtables in ItaniumRTTIBuilder. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D43184 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
