gtbercea added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D43197#1011256, @Hahnfeld wrote:
> Looking more closely at the patch, this doesn't seem to look into the `lib` / > `lib64` next to the compiler. I'm not sure if `LIBRARY_PATH` is set for every > installation, so I think we should add this one to catch the obvious case. > This probably needs some attention for the tests because they'll find the > just-built libraries... The contract with the user us that the .bc lib needs to be in LIBRARY_PATH, this is what we require today. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D43197 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
