rjmccall added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44536#1039428, @rjmccall wrote:
> Hmm. Sema is lazy about actually creating implicit destructor declarations, > but it's supposed to only do it whenever the destructor is actually used for > something. I suspect that Sema just thinks that nothing is using c::~c, > because the only thing that does use it is d::~d, which is inline and has no > apparent users. But from the stack trace, it seems that IRGen is in fact > emitting d::~d. So the question is, why is IRGen emitting d::~d? Because > AFAIK a non-array new-expression never requires the destructor to exist. Oh, because it's used in d's v-table, of course, which is needed by the implicit constructor for d. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D44536 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
