QF5690 added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44539#1041993, @benhamilton wrote:
> I wonder if this wouldn't be better as a clang-tidy check: > > https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang-tools-extra/tree/master/clang-tidy/objc Border between clang-tidy checks and compiler diagnostics is not entirely clear for me, but, as I understand, clang-tidy is more about codestyle and some internal team agreements. The check that I'm adding is intended to prevent crashes, and it is much better to catch such things in compile time. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D44539 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
