obfuscated added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44765#1045373, @alexfh wrote:

> We can't just treat `anything("....")` like the _T macro. There should be a 
> whitelist configurable with an option. By default only _T should be handled.


What cases could break with this version of the patch?
Or you think it is just too dangerous to have this in such generic form?
I'm fine adding an option if this is deemed acceptable.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D44765



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to